Abortion war of words

Regarding “No faith in court ruling” (San Francisco Chronicle Open Forum, May 8): The opinion piece on the leaked Roe v. Wade ruling argues that a fetus is not the same as a human life, and that when a pregnancy endangers a woman’s life, it must be terminated.

The piece was an inadvertent reminder to me of how the pro-abortion movement has lost the word “life” to anti-abortionists. We need to take it back.

An abortion is not just about controlling our own bodies, it’s about protecting the physical, emotional and intellectual life of the mother. The one too young to raise a child alone. The one raped by an abuser. The one who can’t afford a bigger family.

The one who might die from delivery: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports 700 pregnancy-related deaths happen each year in the U.S. The maternal mortality rate for 2020 was nearly 24 deaths per 100,000 live births.

Messaging matters. The pro-abortionists language of controlling our own bodies is logical, but it doesn’t resonate against the near-magic of the language of pro-life. Abortion supporters are pro-life, too: the life of the woman.

Susan Gluss, Berkeley

My letter appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle on 5/23/2022

‘Dark Waters’ exposes hidden chemical hazards, but do others lurk?

 This article first appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle on Feb.6, 2020

I woke late to the hazards of Teflon after watching “Dark Waters.” The film recounts DuPont’s dumping of Teflon waste into the waters and farmlands of West Virginia. Thousands of people working at the DuPont plant or living nearby developed ailments, such as kidney cancer, colitis, thyroid disease and more. Farm animals died hideous deaths. It was an egregious case of corporate wrongdoing.

One synthetic chemical in Teflon’s toxic brew was PFOA (a long-chain perfluorooctanoic acid). It took a courageous farmer and a dedicated lawyer to reveal its dangers by waging a 20-year legal battle against DuPont.

Continue reading

Struggle for Americans to get health care is a national disgrace

This article first appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle on June 26, 2019

The terrain darkened as I drove the rural back roads of Georgia, red clay lining the sandy soil, deep-green kudzu choking trees and climbing telephone poles; the highway transformed into bumpy roads wearing worn-out street signs. It was summer 1985, and I was driving to see Mamie, a part-time nanny who’d helped raise me as a child. I barely knew about her own life back then, only that she lived across town, a single mom with a teenage son. I hadn’t seen her for decades.

I was now a 30-something TV reporter in Atlanta. I’d just finished a report about the “sandwich generation” — adults squeezed between caring for their children and their elderly parents — when my mom called. Mamie, she said, had moved to Georgia to care for her ailing mother.

Little did I know then that Mamie’s mother was one of 37 million Americans without health care. The idea of universal coverage wouldn’t surface until a decade later — a Clinton effort that tanked. It took another two decades before Obama signed his signature Affordable Care Act — Obamacare — into law.

Mamie was family. So, on a hot, humid Sunday, I drove west, vintage jazz on the radio. I turned off the interstate and stopped at a dilapidated roadside store. The torn screen door banged shut behind me, as ceiling fans blew a wisp of warm, muggy, air. I grabbed a bottle of cold water and asked folks standing online for directions.

After an awkward silence, a middle-aged white woman in a baggy T-shirt and faded jeans spoke up: “Y’all must be going to the black side of town.” She waved in the general direction.

As I walked out, my naiveté hit me hard. I’d grown accustomed to Atlanta politics, where most power brokers were African American: the police chief; City Council members, including civil rights legend and future Congressman John Lewis; and Mayor Andrew Young. But in the outskirts, the racial split of old emerged.

I started the car’s tired engine and drove down a dusty road flanked by sagging homes, overgrown weeds, and a spray of pines.

Continue reading

Trump reveals Republican Party’s true views on abortion

Read the full op-ed published by the San Francisco Chronicle on April 6, 2016.

by: Susan Gluss

Donald Trump is an unmitigated disaster for the Republican Party. It’s not just that he’s ruining their chances to win the presidency. It’s also that he has exposed the party’s hypocrisy on abortion.

When Trump said women should receive “some form of punishment” for getting an abortion if the procedure was banned, conservatives were quick to denounce his comments. Ditto the right-to-life advocates.

But Trump’s comment reveals the truth about the Republican Party’s antiabortion juggernaut.

Laws in 38 states now allow a person to be charged with homicide if she or he is deemed responsible for the unlawful death of a fetus, according to a Guttmacher Institute report by analyst Andrea Rowan released last fall.

Not all of these laws clearly exempt the pregnant woman herself from being charged, writes Rowan. “These laws are even being used to pursue women who are merely suspected of having self-induced an abortion, but in fact had suffered miscarriages.”

In Indiana, a young woman named Purvi Patel is now serving 20 years of a 46-year prison sentence — the first woman to be convicted under Indiana’s feticide law for ending her own pregnancy.

Continue reading

Team Raises Money for Cancer Research

“It’s a cure from hell,” my aunt said, as she described her son Tim’s bone marrow transplant. “No, it’s worse than that,” she added. Tim was diagnosed with leukemia some 15 years ago. He survived after surgery on “true grit.”

But it takes more than courage to survive. It takes medical care and therapy. It takes scientists, doctors, and research labs to find the cures and treatments for blood cancers. It takes financial support.

Enter Team in Traning, an endurance sports charity program under the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS). It’s dedicated to raising money for blood cancer research and patient care.

Continue reading

Gambling’s False Promise

The lure of gambling as a way to fill city piggy banks mystifies me. Cities and states open their doors to casinos expecting to rake in billions in tax dollars. But they don’t add in the cost of soaring crime rates, traffic gridlock, bankruptcies and addictions. They turn their backs as local shops and restaurants go out of business, abandoned by customers glued to the casino tables.

I first wrote a column about gambling’s false promise in 2004. Even though the underside of gambling is getting more exposure, politicians still don’t get it.

Here’s an excerpt from my column in the San Francisco Chronicle:

Earl Grinols, author of “Gambling in America: Costs and Benefits,” studied the rates of crime, bankruptcies, lost workdays, domestic violence, illness, divorces and more in counties with—and without—casinos. Even using conservative estimates, the economist found that social costs of gambling outweigh benefits 3 to 1. A net loss.

Grinols estimates the annual cost of gambling to the U.S. economy at between $40 billion and $50 billion, nearly half the cost of drug abuse. The bottom line: Gambling takes far more than it gives.

Why encourage a pastime that can destroy people’s lives? “Patrons of Disney World don’t lose their life’s savings in a visit. But casino high-rollers do,” says Grinols. “Moviegoers don’t typically consider suicide on the drive home. But desperate gamblers take swan dives off casino roofs.”

Read more here.

Health & Happiness

The New York Times health section has a column by Gretchen Reynolds on the comparable benefits of sleep and exercise. But how do you balance both—and which do you sacrifice if time is short? Neither, as it turns out. Try going to sleep 15 minutes earlier than usual and getting up 15 minutes later.  I’m game for sleeping in.  But going to sleep earlier? No way!

Read the NYT article here.