Privacy Rights May Hinge on Calif. High Court

Read the full story on the UC Berkeley Law School website.

On a late summer night, in July 2012, California resident Paul Macabeo rolled his bicycle through a stop sign. The street was deserted, but, unbeknown to Macabeo, a patrol car with its lights off had been trailing him. As soon as he rode through the sign, the cops pulled him over.

The officers found his cell phone and searched it—without a warrant and without his consent. Scrolling through the phone, they found illegal photos of child pornography. The officers had only intended to cite Macabeo for failure to stop, a minor infraction. But once they discovered the photos, they handcuffed him and locked him up. He was found guilty of a felony and sentenced to five years of probation.

At the time, Macabeo couldn’t have known that his bike ride—and the cell phone search—would lead to a legal battle that could impact millions of Californians.

Continue reading

Privacy Lost

The National Security Agency (N.S.A.) is not only collecting our personal phone and email records, but the spy agency is also “exploiting its huge collections of data to create sophisticated graphs” of our social connections. Since 2010, according to the New York Times, the agency has been able to quickly pinpoint our friends, colleagues, locations, traveling companions, and more, spying on our personal social networks.

N.S.A. officials refused to divulge to the NYT how many Americans have been caught up in the effort—including the innocent.  But the data is telling:  In 2011, the program was taking in 700 million phone records per day. In August 2011, it began collecting an additional 1.1 billion cellphone records daily from a US company.

Privacy guru and legal scholar Chris Hoofnagle says the U.S. government has to limit the collection of our personal data by government and by private companies. It’s the only way we can protect the last vestige of our private lives.